These new toxens transmute genes into “kill mode” whereby the genes themselves send the chemical signal to croak.
What is not recognized is how closely these chemicals mimic human genes! Such that a part-per-trillonth kills the region of the brain that controls and sends signals for enthalpic action.
Meta constructive matter working energy is the opposite side of the coin involving only two fundamental and universal energies that exist, entropic (energy to rot); and meta constructive matter working energy (energy to live).
What truly happens in “knowing” by smokers and others, by biological sensing to the brain, is how well smokers and these other chemically laden people are aware of the truth that genetically, they “carry on,” do non-smokers do that!? Especially for 500 to 1,000 years more?!
It is simple enough to say that, “America stops smoking.”. Do you then postulate that “the world (that keeps on smoking) wants to live, but the U.S. doesn’t?” Genetically, to pass on your genes you typically can do, say, by your 30th birthday even if you chainsmoke. So by biologically, whose the wiser? Those that pass on their genes but live somewhat shorter lives, or those that want to die, want to take everyone in the family with them, and this family doesn’t smokes (or at least, is not a chain-smoker?
What these part-per-trillonth toxens do, in conjunction with some heavy metals, is deprive the body of the signal for enthalpic energy-motion-action at the receptor site in the brain (or within the genome) where enthalpy would normally engage in productive activity relevant to long-term projections of survival, not just the short-term, i.e., a tornado, or an earthquake, or a really bad storm.
It turns off our genetic survival mechanism, both at the specific site in the brain where it would be found, and/or it transmutes genes, and, therefore changes our human genome to not produce the chemical signal for enthalpic energy to exist in sufficient quantities to respond to the brains’ personality changes involving extroversion-percentage-loss of 1% each current year–begging to ask and receive by this emerging increase in introversion (now, a majority,), divergent answers (multiple answers to choose from–some “out of the box!”), that scientific research finds (or in a true sense–creates)
to stop this nano perpetrator from shutting us down for good!
“–Keven”
The Realism and Hope Foundation 