Monthly Archives: March 2017

human singularity of focus involving unversal ceiling of sanity hence predominance of WQ (wisdom intelligence: knowing When to use something, When not to use something, When to use something else; Or, when to use something entirely different) that includes, IQ, EQ, and SQ (spiritual intelligence: values & meaning) vs. racist singularity & technological super IQ, lacking WQ!

-Keven Jung Young Wm James Tolstoy Sanchez Asia

The President’s revoking Ecology saving policy is unconstitutional.  No president, legislature, or judicial branch can set or judge against the Natural Law of the U.S. Constitution in that nature itself is eliminated. This is an unnatural, unconstitutional act!

There is an argument that common law can be advanced in a more simplified manner to make allowance and assist the less educated, experienced constituent and/or buyer of United States products.

This would allow free-er commerce and allow for cultural exchange that can free-up ideas and increase greater innovation accommodation for consumer products that would actually fulfill the needs of the real consumer, instead of an imaginary consumer–that would not drown the world consumer with products not at the cultural level of a region or sector community within this world that do not meet their emotional IQ, (EQ), not at their spiritual IQ (SQ): value or meaning neither

That is, does this product have meaning to me, SQ, such that what you are telling me to use it for, has “value” to me–and not the manufacturer, in a manner that there is a clear, not forced demand for this consumer item?

Finally, wisdom intelligence–W-IQ, or WQ, is, I assert, a clear and decisive intelligence capable of fundamentally reasoned assertions, that fair better conclusively over time, than ill-conceived IQ “convenience products.”

I further assert, the world as a whole has reasoning capabilities that has WQ, greater than most leaders, and most manufacturers, and need a simplified, culturally-accepted explanation of services offered that consumers can choose to buy–that are clearly explained advantages, and allowing consumers to confirm or disagree with seller’s assertions of “value”–making a decision to “buy service” or not, without pressure from seller of the service.

This includes marketing of wares. Subliminal coercion should be ousted for a marketing strategy designed to reach the actual consumer in their world sector of community, via internet marketing questionnaire surveys, that ask them their needs, so that the questions get answers from them that are actually fulfilling their needs, not buyers’ forced insistence–before enticing them into splurging on wants–if that is even possible by global workers.

Laws should prevent bullying, abusive, macho marketing designed to pummel consumers into products they don’t want or they don’t need–simply because they truthfully are unaffordable, but coerced in marketing strategy.

This is on a global level. Needing consumer protection law–simplified, common law in the United States’ fifty states that addresses the actual global sector communities through much- more-needed marketing strategies that fulfills accurately actual needed demand.

Don’t sell essential needed products like Disneyland adventures. Marketing strategies need to capture very accurately the buyer’s (consumer’s) needs such that any wants thrown at them in macho, peer-fashion, bullying techniques are lawfully not allowed in marketing strategies in the United States addressed to the billions of world population sector communities.

Don’t pull a wild card on the world consumer that uses coercive marketing strategies not fulfilling essential needs of workers who have needs to continue their effort at working and need whatever other time to get their needs fulfilled and find healthier forms of pleasure.

Aggressive marketing needs to target, by WQ, the workers needs so their work for American business is quality #1 and at top speed.

And the marketing in the media needs to reflect American business and other world business leaders very high demand for efficiency and speed from today’s global worker that can only be fulfilled by media marketing that fulfills worker needs to meet world business leaders high demand.

Limits on sexual cannotations can steer a man to fulfill his needs to family and business to better assure him of continued employment in very, very high demanding global jobs.

Abraham “Ricardo” Boulder

Merkel like Andre Greykov’s of Russia,, byproducts of Christianity declaring themselves Christians, killing Jews as messengers of Orthodox “Jew” Church, following Jewish mysticism that is wrong headed and troubling to a merciful heart, explains that “from the very, very worst in terrible acts of leadership of nations and peoples, comes the best in personage greatness (paradise on Earth, missing the essential ingedient–freedom and toleration and equality-by-law enforcement and jury judgments favorable to these victims)”

Arrogance that the forced history of the coming of Heaven not caused by moderates of harm and destruction but extreme wickedness within the Christians, all of which, call themselves “Jew” and do such harm and destruction for Communism acquisition of untold riches in mercantilism for popes and kings, and untold misery and poverty and enslavement (of “human property”), such as in Korea, in non-chalance, horrible, intense collective pain from leadership, domestically, or from various points of origin, with a “sound blessing,” prayed by these popes, possibly kings and emperors too, as though such prayer is “coming from heaven.” In addition, many doctors of divinity have “heard the trumpet call.” I argue: not out of divine intervention or inspiration but Satan’s riches they steal from reformed liberal economies in royal mercantilism, against robust democracies, whose public education institutions must not be warehouses of death mercenaries (for-profit, serial-killing businesses, in what other countries legally call, crimes against humanity)–instituted.
# # #

DISCLAIMER:
1) fiction tale and (2) religious madness during “tired sobriety:” Boulder wakes up to.
.->. ->. ->. ->. ->. ->.

Now, what of it?!

Is killing Jew or any group within World Court legal allowances? Or clearly expressed as acceptable action directly or indirectly to engage in genocide (serial murders) by the respective governments?! I say imperatively, “No.”

States of the union, since 1919, allegedly have clearly engaged in genocide tactically of more than a few victims. Notably, although equally tragic, is the legal interpretation that the Declaration of Independence is Not a legal document–when it is–and rebellion against tyranny, even if it is a hegemony and not a dictatorship, directly or indirectly–expressed in dissent in behavior or verbal expression does not, and will never warrant assassination of the constituents of that state(s).

Such action by any of the states of the Union, or in conjunction with other states, is constitutionally prohibited! Federal action against constituents for arbitrary assassination to elicit a form of terrorism in tyranny by Government is likewise constitutionally prohibuted, as it is illegal to assassinate directly or indirectly constituents in dissent of the party in power or by other party members!

Abraham Boulder, constituent of the United States of America.

Communism doesn’t serve the people, but the hegemony.

Liberal economics allows the individual to decide he or she needs and his or wants in a wise budget. From such commerce comes an “invisible hand” that determines price of a good or product based on demand for the good, and the supply available in retail stores and through the stratium of business and industry suppliers. It’s an equilibrium, that works independent of controls. Too much political pressure for Intervention will interrupt private enterprise and private initiative and their business universes, and falter the health of what-would-be a state economy.

Too much price fixing, little or no competition, and a propensity to seize private ventures, private personal assets, and corporate profits, or nationalizing usually occurs. The Bill of Rights would be disregarded by a Government whose legal definition of citizen or “constituent” is government property, and no protection against government abuse.