Let Me Make Myself Clear

Let Me Make Myself Clear
Many important books of the times are written mediocre, at best. Such are the works of 1984, The Animal Farm, and the book, Intellectuals.

Intellectuals makes the point that, should you be exercising yourself by intellectualizing, history can be destroyed (the future of humankind, “bleeped” off the screen, forever).

It is my evolving interest in scientific actuality, one that has a 500-year tradition of generation after generation, everyday people, coming up with possible answers to solutions in scientific actuality; that these inquisitive creators-in-their-own-mind–first children, then adults, contain a wide, varied accounting of what is scientifically actual. They become professional scientists, sometimes laymen, laywomen, possibly laychild natural philosophers (e.g., in family-run business–children could possibly do this) has carriage-drawn-me to the following specific point:

Those who go about, “intellectualizing as exercise do it as “Reality!”

It is though, in fact, a derivative away from actuality; that in critical moments of history, it is “a losing proposition.”

So, one whom wishes to exercise intellectually needs, on a continual, intentional basis, to reach “base camp” (i.e., scientific actuality) in order for your leadership to not be labeled with the distinct symptom of “delusion” in a qualified brain-disorder book.

However, there is a caveat here.

1) The workings of the mind has limits when you believe in “spirit.”. Not that these limits are limiting to everyday function, or scientific inquiry, though.

2) The feelings of someone may be expressed in simple affect intelligence in aerie Shakespearen substance, and,

3) Gut Feelings, the book, written by at-the-time, Dir., Max Planck Institute of Human Development, is on to something.

That Kahneman thoroughly and exhaustively dismisses, quite impressively, the notion that “anything goes” in inquiry of validity of an intuitive subject that comes to mind. When, in fact, most intuitive inquiries are false, and all speculation, at that moment of reverie, can be completely false.

Regaining confidence, and composure, we proceed from those facts,, as follows:

Gut Feelings has a term, “rule of thumb” that needs discussion.

A thumb, was a measuring tool of centuries ago, called an “inch”… just as
the arm was a measuring tool, called a “yard,” although some say your feet, which are called in mesurement tool, “a foot” would, when brought into one’s stride, would measure out, to be also called the term, “a yard.”

This is ‘right off the bat,” a discipline in construction that focuses on the physical parameters around you.

But through the centuries of generation after generation, the everyday person who had these “rules of thumb” could turn his or her head from “rule of thumb” thinking to post-pythagorean philosophy and propositions, to, then, scientific inquiry, which the mathematician would later find, throughout the universe, and having metrics proportional between an object and another object, and then third object, ad infinitum. So, similar proportional occurences that have symmetry and proportion in the human body, have items of porportion in the universe.

The metrics, the quantity numbers on the universe and the human body all are proportional to there respective bodies.

The philosophy of angles, degrees, porportions is post-pythagorean. The thought based on quantified metrics involving angles, degrees, and proportions represented in mathematical equations is the science of physics.

In particle physics and possibly, in nano physics, it is already, I believe, discussed that one particle can touch another although a million years apart.

Particles or nanos conceivably can be “spit” out of a person to another person subliminally with similar intuitive functioning of each of their personalities of their brain. However, there is a big caveat here and, that is, for sanity reasons, for this form of mental health to be maintained, we use Jungian terms: a) that the first and second person, both have a personal, private unconscious each, and b) that there is a commons that serves as a visual location and vehicle for social discussion in the common unconscious (e.g., golf course, a tennis court, basketball game or in baseball, volleyball or in football) while each person is at home or elsewhere from the social venue.

This idea structure in the psyche (one of the brain-mind idea structures) avoids the applied communist problem, found in socialist communist and fascist socialist world consciousness, that has no boundaries between persons and interferes with job requirements and what a person has to do to survive for the him and his family.

Would there be a subconscious, there can be a meandering stream of calm, that could serve as reminders to help stay alive, and be well; while work gets done, and living conditions occurring below in figurative form.

Neurostructure determines if this developed intuitive function into the subconscious of the psyche is a social discussion of the brain that involves a social animal that experiences his own imaginings of two or more people talking to him; or discussions of him within a social venue (where persons congregate) context separate from where he and others are, away from the venue.

In other words, if two people have the appropriate intuitive brain structures and intuitive personality psyches, they, themselves, would be well cased in their brains and the vehicle imagined of a social venue, a common grounds IN PUBLIC would have these two persons apart in a different location from that venue, but the imagined venue, or commons, would be experienced aerie-Shakespearen substance away from their present locations, apart from one another.

Now, I will discuss, rule-of-thumb psyche intuitive personality, and what it has to do with post-pythagorean philosophy of a natural philosopher.

In other words, where I get my stuff on my postings from.

[TO BE CONTINUED]
–Keven Jung Young Wm. James Tolstoy.