Defense inquiry

Defense inquiry

Book on notions of AI. Has a contributor trash people fighting a system made up of mainframe computers engineered away from the formal structure and support system we call “constitutional law”.

State law recognized once the bill of rights of the U.S. Constitution are laid out as valid and keeping with day jobs and night loves.

Did I just give the keys to my condo for further false accusations and misrepresentation of law such that what I did, was legal, and my attorney, a instructor of law did not build a legal defense in my case, but instead laughed in my face, and claimed my actions were indefensible when RCW 9A states explicitly, “detain person(s) with minimal force, in a secure building, to inquire, what the devil they are doing there!?” . . . such that what I did to the person(s) in the building I partly owned, follows the law, and was a legal action done when I was exhausted from not sleeping for two days, and adverse from sleeping pills leaving me in a hostile state that brought me out of my condominium unit, disturbing the peace with minor damage restricted to a bottom door handle–Never compromising the dead bolt lock, Nor “breaking and entering” by kicking the door in–not to be!

My actions entailed using the air gun assembly as defense when two people exited the condo on my left. Pointing this pellet gun–treated by Washington State law as a firearm, to keep them away from me, again, I was adverse from sleeping pills given to me by the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs–making me very tired.

When the couple chose to move towards me, rapidly, I changed gun assembly for butt stick, smaller than conventional fire arm wood stick

I used minimal force of butt stock stick by “popping  up” and bringing light stick on top of head.  I was of light weight myself.

I saw them lock up with one key, the dead bolt key. Didn’t have it on a key chain common for someone who has ownership of a condo unit. They were stocky, and to be honest, they looked like they could have just moved all the furniture out of the place. They moved fast and I had my butt stick well before me. When they reached for the stick, I acted in such a manner detailed in RCW 9A of the Revised Code of Washington. I acted in self-defense under extenuating circumstances stemming from an adverse reaction to the chemical, Trozodone, experiencing serotonin syndrome used as a sleeping aid. I was assertive and acted legally with minimal force.I needed to keep my defending instrument, and determine if they had a right to be in the secured building.

My actions entailed disturbing the peace. And defended my self in order to detaine person(s) to enquire why they were there (in a secure building). I never saw them before. They were stocky built, and I was quite thin.

Everything I was accused of, the entire statement is false. That statement is backed with false forensic science evidence. The RCW law was learnt by a book at the Seattle Public Library.  2009 year law language RCW 9A, “self-defense,” “limitations.”

Abraham Boulder–Keven