I want to be constructive.

I want to achieve constructive effort.

Do critical constructive good and critical constructive bad. Beyond good & evil. Correct ethical standards of the ubermensch. Part of sane approaches for year 2100 and year 2200. 6th extinction is the apocalypse. Jehovah Witness members can pray and rejoice.

Man, woman and child(ren) can choose Final final Armageddon 80 percent extinction rate as “the end.” We are presently at 70 percent extinction rate of all living species.

Christians can rejoice. Man can survive and thrive.

It mimicks humanity–all its poignancy. It is Baryshniov et al. But for the uglines of the state.  It is not the mental illness of Najiinsky speaking to the intellectuals of the people of Russia but state psychiatric institutions mànifesting from these intelectuals that cause the people’s continued sufferring.

It is in existentialsm of the “grand state” that is truly lackng in existence. Lacking in truth and sinceritÿ, human compassion IN TRUTH insisting in a volley of insincerities modeled cheaply, pefectly to show ĥow the state can perfect existential sterility as a false, higher being, for the false higher place. 

Not to be a higheŕ human being on a higher human plane that comes only from “existential, constructive effort and existential, constructive  achievement.

Baryshnikov may have captured the essence in epihanies of French culture in human expressionism. But whee does it go to now?

It harbors in the dementiated mental brain disorders of the populations having high-society labotomies where “correctness” and “properness” are maintained in the “ultimate partie du froid grace, smart-computer-chip sandwhich,” and which at the same time we keep living greater and greater isolation from our thoughts, our persons, and the hidden consequences of our chosen inadequate humanity?

But has it really been chosen by us? Or is it the corporate product of 450 lbs to 550 lbs liposuction bodies with tyranical “big hearts” excesses, gladly labotomizing what thought processes remain for brain inserts of “proper” and “correct” and “educated” brain-mass behavioral results.  To be the epitomy of American lifestyle excess, techno “proper” pseudo behavior and pesonal attributes. The new American cowboy.

Abraham Boulder. -Keven.

international consortium from Colombia wishes to invade home of U.S. constituent.

Seek illegally to capture private moments. Next door they still have 13 screens on me.

Wish to imprison U.S. constituent by betting/gambling on his next move. So he can’t do anything without it amounting to à whole rigamarole over what he’ll do next.

Agent in charge of this international fiasco: PCB

younger generation trying to seep poisons by gravity feed through cracks in ceiling. Using nerve agent in gravity feed to mimic tremors I get.

Opinion | What You Need to Know in Case of an Election Crisis – The New York Times

Out of sound man and woman conscience, out of action, dictates of history prevail.

It has emotional intelligence in pursuant of history, in order to contain affective inteligence correctly and speak confidently in the face of tĥe contemporaneous abyss, in the peak is transversed upon cavernous peril.

30 to 20, not not 5 to 2 or 1. Extinction rate matters, God does not pursue our death, man pursues his own. Do not destroy all of creation. The insane pursue a “stupendous” chemical in the spirit of the “happy” and ” crazy” nirvana (or severely brain disorderd).  Don’t trust leadeships’ judgement without wise, sound counsel to guide their decisions.

Seek 20, if not 30.

Abraham Boulder

Maybe We Are Asking Presidential Candidates the Wrong Questions

Aug. 31, 2024, 11:00 a.m. ET nytimes.com

Maybe We Are Asking Presidential Candidates the Wrong Questions

Aug. 31, 2024, 11:00 a.m. ET

If the goal of the CNN interview with Vice President Kamala Harris and Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota was to relitigate the campaign controversies of the last month — to get the candidates to talk about the major narratives of the election so far — then it was a rousing success. Harris easily dispatched questions about her identity and gave a strong defense of President Biden’s record. Walz, likewise, made short work of the charge that he had misled the public when he spoke about using one fertility treatment when it was actually another, similar treatment.But if the goal was to learn something about a prospective President Harris — to gain insight into how she might make decisions, order priorities and approach the job of chief executive — then I think the interview was not a success. Not so much for Harris or the viewing public.It might be interesting to journalists to know how Harris explains her changing views from 2019, when she ran for the Democratic nomination, to now, when she is the nominee. But it is not at all clear to me that it is interesting to viewers, who may be less concerned with how she deals with the question and more concerned with the actual substance of what she wants to do as president. A soft-focus question about a photograph, however iconic, seems less valuable than a question about Harris’s view of the presidency now that she’s spent almost four years in the passenger’s seat as vice president.Speaking for myself, I am less interested in hearing candidates navigate controversies or speak to narratives than I am in hearing them talk, for lack of a better term, about their theory of the office. How does a candidate for president conceptualize the presidency? What would she prioritize in office and how would she handle an endless onslaught of crises and issues that may, or may not, demand her attention? How does she imagine her relationship with Congress and how would she try to achieve her goals in the face of an opposition legislature? How does she imagine her relationship with the public and what value does she place on communication and the bully pulpit? Are there presidents she most admires — and why? Are there presidential accomplishments that stand out and how so? What are the worst mistakes a president can make? Why do you want this job in the first place?I can think of other questions along these lines, but you get the gist. To know what candidates for president think about the office and their role in it is, I believe, a better guide to what they may do in the White House than almost anything else. The only thing better is prior experience. These kinds of questions may not make for the most scintillating television, but I think they could provide the kind of insights that could actually help Americans decide what they want out of a national leader.

keven is “Avi.”

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/methanes-climate-crisis-needs-more-than-satellites-to-stop-emissions/

Yuval Noah Harari is the intelectual and spiritual 536 AD Icelandc volcano.  Darkening the sky helping the rodent flea infestation of the Black Justinian plague. Sending out hell fire, poisonous gas, tremendous earhquakes, deeply alarming sound acoustics, swallowing persons whole, sacraficing large amounts of populations to the voĺcano to appease its ferocity.  All show a darkness seeming impenetrable, but alas maybe survivable on more socially human terms.

and yielding the Hawaiian islands metaphorically.

Abraham Boulder. -Keven is “Avi.”

PCB is a bio social (contagion) black plague working differently from bubonic plague, but just as lethal and remains may be worse.

Ŵig-wam sends kids with minor guns under the condo unit, in the dirt, to shoot at me. One hit me ìn the leg.