The government enters into an agreement with industry to use economic incentives and decentives on a scale, called “the value index.” It takes into account bonuses of money for business operations (applied business behavioral science) doing the decisive things required by the Dean of the Earth Sciences department of our leading universities to save our species at the right place (x = O, “do no harm”; 0 < z <= +1, correct constructive action) at the right time, and legislation passed to redefine the corporation so destructive businesses (on the Value Index , 0 >= y > -1, negative one equals, nuclear winter) whose net gains are “huge” or “obscene” (not “big”) invest in competing subsidiaries, who proceed with enterprise on a schedule task regimen assigned coordinating body schedulers’ assignments deadlines associated with following priorities set by dean of department chemistry, biology, physics departments’ head coordinator meet for each department head who assigns tasks done timely basis (no longer than this) from the respective professors in these departments.
The value on the index ranging from 0 < z <= +1 (in decimals) can be used as the economic incentive plus market value for net gain dollar value (in real dollars) mathematically by multiplying the decimal value by market price and adding it solely to the market price. The value on the index with a “y” value of -1 <= y <= O, where y equal to negative one, is nuclear winter, or devastation; and y equal to zero, is “to do nothing, is like, doing harm or destruction,” can be the dollar value (in real dollars) of the economic disincentive.
The economic incentive “z” times the market price, (in real dollars) can come from “negative y” times market price (in real dollars).
Although, at first there would be fudging, what these weights do, determined by an assessor, is to show how far we are pulling a loaded gun’s hammer back–preparing to shoot ourselves in the head with live ammunition.
We are all terrible, in Hobbesian accountability, and so to acknowledge the extent that we do “bad” is to show care for our widest horizon for the greatest amount of gross profit, $100 million trillion (in real 2008 dollars); and be able to spend it for many years to come, without overall physics in the environment and our person turning rancid by negative-weighted physics (of chaos) in human biology (e.g., increase in cancers) and negative behavioral sciences (anti-social disorders, causing billions or trillions of dollars in damages).
The destructive potential and realization is less for the Justice Department and more of an appraisal with various (and all!) organizations on determining how much we’re destroying ourselves.
An accurate appraIsal can buy us more and more time for (1) sane physics in mental and physical health–less creation of exponentially augmented brain disorders, (2) less creation of exponentially augmented major physical diseases, and (3) widest horizon for net profit over an expanding horizon of $100 million trillion in 500 years in 2008 real U.S. dollars, instead of closure and final final stop.
Abraham Boulder
The Realism and Hope Foundation 