“…how metaphysical concepts, such as the self, morality, or our experience of the world around us are processed in the brain. We have begun to study how the brain forms concepts about free will, and how such experiences are perceived and interpreted.”
What Andrew Newberg calls, a study of “neurohermeneutics,” an interdiciplinary mingle of brain reality with philosophical ideation and sometimes biblical contexts. He adds,
“It is hoped that the concepts considered in this book will be able to help future scientists, philosophers, and theologians, as they proceed to develop their own metaphysical ideas by exploring existing knowledge and ultimately developing their own approaches based upon their own brain processes.”
our experience of the world around us”
Cartesian: you can only know the self. The world around us is secondary. Separating you from five senses.
Metaphysical ontology is the crises in “Crisis in Democracy.”
Philosophically at-large, Gassendi “reason is an aspect of spirit”; Carl Jung, an intuitive function of consciousness starting with five-senses consciousness; private. personal unconsciousness; a metanormal unconsciouness’ commons that typically recalls a venue(s) as a plot, to include normal group interaction scenarios with your self and others in imagination.
Such imagination occurs because “conversation-with-an-other” involves imagination irregardless if there is actual, primary communication, the bottomline is that it is secondary–in the common unconscious–and the individual oriented from consciousness to private, personal unconscious to an idea quanta site in the commons unconscious pooling imagination of a group or subgroup of imagined people (remembered from venue scenery) in a shared idea quanta (matter/energy) space for communication interaction at the secondary level of human (imagined) interaction. (Not “primary, actual,” or even “primary imagined”)
Abraham Boulder terms constructive philosophical achievement by, “psyche economy surplus,” differentially separating “constructive thought” from “destructive thought” exercised philosophically.
[thoughts deleted at an error occurrence (mine) via PCB’s fanatic, extremely spiteful modality competing for five-sense death and obscuring psyche economy surplus agency with “disruptor agency” for a remainder of only psyche economy deficit in substitution.
Speaks volumes in Faustian, delusional longevity, but sacrafices the future tense entirely.
This pathos and cognitive faculties of PCB illustrate “the demise theory” in Western thought and Eastern demise (nazi and Aryan) unbalanced group-death experience of Tao, which includes eternal jovial mental illness prevailing in saliency (in the biggest 4K UHD television screen ever devised for you “by the gods.”) Severe mental illness lunacy, eternally.
This is the sane theory for the purpose of explaining metaphysical phenomenon lacking status quo, popular explanations, and answers the question of if the imagination is actual. It depends what the five senses tell you to confirm your creativity or disprove your notion (including what necessary scientific instruments tell you, and original peer review on experiments and their conclusions, over time.
The answer is that it always needs a reality check with the use of one or more of our five senses.
A political science maneuver to never solve our pressing problems “out of mind;” that is, with 21st Century, beyond post-modernt thought.
Einstein is paraphrased in saying, “you can’t solve the world’s pressing problems in the mindset that they were created.”
Staying with the 20th Century thinker means retarded leadership in adminstering law and maintainng a prolific homocidal-order arrangement for democracy’s demise and a plunderer’s mentality that defies Hobbesian logic that, “pooled assets keep businesses honest.” Meaning, “gold reserves” kept in the economic and political system, or putting 21st Century minds to task to create “the beyond post-modern era” in liberal economy and democracy fueled by the expenditure of gold reserves payments in deliberate global economic and political development in a new paradigm with actual problem-solving achievements, occuring (i.e., shifting).