Demand for wisdom intelligence, WQ, an acquired self-knowledge not taught in colleges and universities

Self knowledge of intuition is the way to manage our dangerous and lethal technologies.

Wisdom intelligence and affect intelligence kept on a short leash, but usable–doable has the capacity to win.

To have learned about your self, and your own me, to learn what your “I” is about in dynamics and precaution puts the pressure of aquiring wisdom intelligence (that is, an idea whom grabs your attention by the scruff of the neck and tells you “we are in a ‘do or die’ situation now–this moment–and alternative voices with high relevant impact must be heard and acted on (nay or yeah!).” And this juncture may have frequent passes so the cognitive process must be stream-lined but not be made into a diminutive, precautious device.

What resides cognitively is a continual feed “what does this–in the moment–and in context of meeting set short and long-range goals leads to winning the game 10 years in time from now (two years ahead of schedule to account for unanticipated delays).”

How is the process going forward via self-reflection by constructive intuitive analysis by those who apply both, intuition and corporal, mechanical logic; or someone self-taught in constructive intuition that needs to be used at this crux moment in history to think “out of mind” purpose-ly because Einstein said (paraphrasing), “you can’t solve the problem in the mindset the problem got made in.” Paradigm shifts in context of our new original goals in the 21st Century take original thinking outside of the previous paradigm mindset, where the problem, or conflict arose.

So “the town or urban crier” makes himself available to coordinate in general conversation with the public for the leadership considering a new paradigm; looking for an “out of mind,” constructive, intuitive co-leader) whom makes suggestions with a weight on the “hidden mind” or subconscious. But specifically, the common unconscious–the pool of information available to a private, personal consciousness and subconscious whom recollects upon a venue whom he and others just previously attended (a golf course, tennis, fishing), and relate to others in a socially acclimated brain state of helath (hence) he is naturally conversant in his subconscious with commons venue participants, or staff, shared with other’s private, personal unconsciousness and this second person’s, perspective of this venue experience in the common unconsciousness of his, the second person’s private, personal unconscious.

Thereby considering in conversation information he and someone else who was previously at the same venue consider together later, but not by one-on-one ESP (point-to-point interaction)–not accepted by the American Psychiatric Association.

No, by the shared venue commons. The environs is the venue and the recollection of the venue commons serves as the vehicle to discuss matters of interest or importance that may be “an issue in conflict” and without investing overly in concern, interests reside in resolvimg the conflicted innervation in the psyche in the common(s) unconscious correctly, as the ideal solution response, provided time is made for constructive, intuitive context and alternative follow-through action in regards to the biggest venue we have, exoplanet Earth itself.

Abraham Boulder

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s