The Fallen is a group of doctors, not medical doctors administering medication and exchanging leadership personnel.
It is first of all not recommended that you tell corporately that you have mental illness unless you are requesting reasonable accommodation when it is impossible to do your job otherwise.
Sir Ken Robinson wrote “Out of your Mind” for good, and great leaders.
The meaning is to use “the unusual” or “different,” and yes, I’ll say it: “the mentally ill” whom in pragmatic terms lead themselves and possibly others to perspectives different from what exists now: to good judgment and good judgments only when you consent or approve to their judgment.
In addition, it really would be an altered state of consciousness that is or is not hampering others with their illness. Where learning and understanding occurs on both sides of health consumers and co-workers perspectives for enhanced analytical horizons and problem solving, you don’t play to the disadvantage of the team when consciousness includes abnormal consciousness used in leadership roles on judgment calls. Abnormal consciousness leadership plays to the stregnth in what may be called, “unusual”–sometimes called, “unheard of.”
And where some take drugs to experience other conscioussnesses; but lose these unconsciousnesses when the drug wears off.
The ill is capable of being trained to respond more, react less and walk away from a prospective scene psychoanalytically laden to victimize members in an instance of potential bullying, but also achieve the paradigm shift to solve the problem. The paradigm shift that cannot solve the problem because the drug you took for the paradigm shift has to wear off to execute the answer but when attempting to execute the solution the drug, or paradigm shift has “worn off.” There’s a wall tithe target solution.
Now discipline to “not do any harm” by pointing fingers at people or subliminally, deiberately doing harm using emotional illness purposely by administering it to the unsuspecting in their subconsciousness without telling associates to discipline themselves to avoid potential “lethargic states” of the ill.
This is a common sense approach frequently experienced with the depressed. Their problem should not become your problem. Their work should not get confused with your own work. But offensive remarks is inappropriate.
In both cases restraint in behavior can yield consciousness “annexing” to the strict norm with additional perspective or resources (different facets of a diamond, if you will) that provide consciousness or unconciousness information that literally leads to different associaions and paradigm shifts significant enough to actually solve many nasty problems that don”t have adequate solutions in the previous paradigm.
Key here is “some neurochemical difference” that people have. By trying to obtain consciousness annexation by using–drugs–the user typically loses the unconscious material as the drug wears off. No paradigm shift, no new solutions; therefore, no profit, and now a drug user.
+ + + + + + +
Also, on an another matter, smart boxes (“neural assist chips”) in partial brain owners solves when possible daily functioning problems.
But if it gets tricky (by fancy footwork in algorythm use), you are vulnerable to inputs from some programmers somewhere (not the smartbox recipient); therefore, not holding the colleague responsible for his thoughts, actions is inconsistent with the destiny of the company. Knowing someone calibrating the smartbox may hold the sway of your company’s future if he is not held accountable for smartbox’s recipient’s physical actions or misdirected decisions.
The finger points to the programmer, not the rmisdirected decisions of the recipient.
Abraham Boulder.
The Realism and Hope Foundation 